A Wired story named The Complexity of Simply Procuring For Clinical Recommendation came out the day before at the sleek time and is getting pretty a ramification of attention – briefly it talks about how Google offers with returning quality files in search, when the files readily within the market on the rating is tiny for the demand.
For most of you SEOs, these “keyword voids” or “files voids” because the article puts it is opportunity to rank your content. Nevertheless for Google, Google wants quality content that helps the searcher. If there is a void of files around that keyword phrase, how does Google tackle it.
Google historically called these “inferior unicorns” as Matt Cutts, formerly of Google, acknowledged on Twitter, “when I was at Google I called this the “inferior unicorn protest” (because there’ll not be any longer grand content for inferior unicorns, but that it’s essential to restful look for that), but “keyword voids” is grand extra evocative.”
Danny Sullivan, whose roll it is to protect Google, went ahead and posted referring to the story on Twitter. Essentially, none of here’s new, but it is relaxing to be taught by means of:
I wager Matt Cutts is thinking, thank goodness I no longer admire to tackle these studies. 🙂
Dialogue board dialogue at Twitter.