Google Sees Disavows Links Between Canonical URLs
|Google’s John Mueller said it’s a ways best to disavow the total potential areas the link could also simply be pointing to, even in case you redirect one URL to one more and someone is linking to the authentic URL. But he said Google can converse and glimpse “links between canonical URLs, so when there might be a redirect concerned, you are going to should check which one is canonical.”
He said this on Twitter and suggested that as a substitute of you manually checking what Google thinks is the canonical URL, you are going to also right place the time and disavow both cases.
Sorry — I missed this :). Marie's recommendation of right disavowing both is per chance best. On our facet, we glimpse links between canonical URLs, so when there's a redirect concerned, you'd should check which one is canonical. Doing both saves you the extra work π
β 🍌 John 🍌 (@JohnMu) April 18, 2019
Right here is the authentic question:
…because of the the positioning in actual fact lands on location 2 url and that's the one who's harmful spammy #sneakyspammers – this might be a senior second for me and I'm making this more sturdy than it has to be.. π @JohnMu pic.twitter.com/YemVX0MztH
β Donna 'SnowWrite' Snow #techseo (@SnowWrite) April 17, 2019
Marie Haynes said:
Also, foremost level…does the page redirected to in actuality uncover a link to your location? If no longer, you are going to also ignore. If so, then you definately have to disavow site2.
β Marie Haynes (@Marie_Haynes) April 18, 2019
Most regularly redirect chains and canonicals should no longer continually so certain and clear. So strive to abet it easy.
Forum dialogue at Twitter.