Google Says Meta Refresh Redirects Work Graceful But No longer Instructed
I literally believe quite a bit of blog posts here that has Google announcing now not to make employ of the meta refresh redirect form. That it’s predominant to peaceable employ a 301 or 302 redirect in its build and now not the meta refresh model.
But does it work? Does the usage of a meta refresh model of the redirect work? Smartly, it’s likely you’ll per chance per chance per chance take a look at it or lunge by what John Mueller of Google acknowledged on Twitter this morning, the build he acknowledged it does work.
“A meta refresh form redirect must peaceable upright work,” John acknowledged. Once Google processes the meta refresh redirect, they attain treat it love every diversified redirect. John added “we manufacture now not suggest it for 2 causes: UX (it retains the page in browser historical past, afaik) & processing time (we decide to parse the page to ogle it).”
Right here are some tweets spherical this dialog from this morning:
A meta refresh form redirect must peaceable upright work. We manufacture now not suggest it for 2 causes: UX (it retains the page in browser historical past, afaik) & processing time (we decide to parse the page to ogle it). Once processed, or now not it’s upright love a redirect.
— John ☆.o(≧▽≦)o.☆ (@JohnMu) March 2, 2018
We manufacture now not believe any tips on the delay number, however whenever it’s likely you’ll per chance per chance per chance per chance love it treated love a redirect, it makes sense to believe it act love a redirect (and reduction the delay minimal). The same goes for JS-basically basically based completely redirects.
— John ☆.o(≧▽≦)o.☆ (@JohnMu) March 2, 2018
301 or 302 is really upright a inquire of of which URL is canonical, that can lunge both manner here, so ensure your diversified canonicalization systems replicate the manner you wish it to head.
— John ☆.o(≧▽≦)o.☆ (@JohnMu) March 2, 2018
Forum dialogue at Twitter.
