Google Ignoring The rel=canonical For Syndication Partners?

So we factual lined that Google said the very best map is to power your syndication companions to expend the rel=canonical attribute to speak the content they disbursed out of your location. But Glenn Gabe said on Twitter he has considered Google not honoring that.

First, right here is the Google assertion – speak that Google did say “it would not guarantee only one version is shown despite the incontrovertible truth that.”

For syndication, the expend of rel=canonical is the very best map (it would not guarantee only one version is shown despite the incontrovertible truth that). For internationalization, expend hreflang in its effect.

— Google Web content house owners (@googlewmc) December 2, 2019

Here is Glenn’s tweet:

Every other warning if you is probably going to be syndicating content. Inspecting a location hit by the 11/8 change & stumbled on many syndicated articles CORRECTLY USING REL CANONICAL that had been restful listed. Yep, Google is ignoring rel canonical… Wicked for the effect & atrocious for the companions. Area is addressing now pic.twitter.com/hlLfEH6LRc

— Glenn Gabe (@glenngabe) November 27, 2019

Here’s a minute bit more:

That is not gorgeous. Google can solely ignore rel canonical if the content is not the a similar, but right here is the particular same article be conscious for be conscious. Scandalous arena canonical is the in fact useful solution for handling syndicated content (beyond factual noindexing the content). So right here is terrifying.

— Glenn Gabe (@glenngabe) November 28, 2019

So while Google says you must plan the syndication partner expend the rel=canonical – Google admits it can not factual list your content, but could list the partner and right here is Glenn Gabe displaying Google ignoring the rel=canonical label fully anyway?

Discussion board dialogue at Twitter.